Jason Jennings and Miguel Asencio from the Rockies to the Astros
Willy Taveras, Jason Hirsh and Taylor Buchholz from the Astros to the Rockies.
So what do I think of this trade yall wanna know.
The thing about trades is because salaries explode after a guy becomes a FA, you can’t just look at the trade the way you could before free agency and long contracts. Even though most people won’t save and refuse to ever think that there is a future beyond the immediate present, you DO have to think about the future. And it sure seems to me that this is something that the Astros are not doing this year.
So let’s try this a different way -
- send a starting pitcher starting his 6th year of ML service (FA next year) being paid 5.5 mill (no more years)
- send a relief pitcher, a FA on a 1 year contract, being paid 550K (no more years)
- send a ML CF starting his 3rd year of ML service – no contract yet, but will be cheap (4 years)
- send a ML starting pitcher starting his second year of ML service, being paid peanuts (5 years)
-send a ML starting pitcher still in his first year of ML service, paid peanuts (6 years)
So the Rockies will have 3 cheap ML ballplayers for over 4 years and the Astros will have no one at the end of the year and will have lost the services of 3 cheap ML ballplayers for 4 years.
You give up 3 good young players for a rent a player when you are going for broke. Does that make sense for the Astros?
Let’s take a look at the players:
1 – Willy Tavares: I’m not so sorry that Willy was gone – he wasn’t that great. Burke and Bruntlett can certainly play center (from what I read, Hunter Pence is not a good fielder, so I think they will eventually put him in right, so he’s not exactly the answer.) Willy is a below average bat, a decent base stealer, a somewhat above average defender and terrrible at hitting with MOB. Career OBA – for a leadoff guy .329 (not too good.) Career OPS .668 and average RCAA over his 2 years of ML ball is -15. Not good offensively, we know. Defensively, as I’ve said before, by most defensive statistics experts have him ranked around 5th of the 16 NL CF. I would bet he’s going to be another Juan Pierre in Coors, but perhaps with a little better success, because he hits more grounders. Hey, guys who can run down fly balls in that big ol outfield are valuable even if they are not good hitters.
2 – Jason Hirsh, age 24, was our AAA pitcher of the year, and has been rated very highly as a rookie for several years. He had, um, a bit more trouble in the bigs – started 9 games, got smashed in 2, did lousy in 3 more, and pretty well in the other 4. But he made some sort of rookie mistake when he was late for some practice or meeting and everyone made a serious big deal out of this – like he wasn’t doin enough of the required rookie fake humility stuff. Me, I think his stuff didn’t look that good, but I would bet serious $$$ that the team was all up set about the “makeup” stuff. Here are his stats – 2.22 HR/9 IP; 4.43 BB/9 IP; 5.84 k/9 IP; 6.04 ERA; 1.57 WHIP over 44.1 IP in 9 GS. Now me, I am not ready to say a pitcher sucks after only 9 ML starts, 4 of them good ones, especially after a really good minor league career, but hey, I guess if you are judged by your dumb rookie mistakes, well then, I guess Jason was a goner. So we have given up 6 years of a guy who was a top prospect here.
3 – Taylor Buchholz, age 25 – well, yall know I think he has absolutely electric stuff. ELECTRIC. Trouble is, that he had problems with a tendon in the finger of his pitching hand – which I did not know about during the year, as well as blisters. He also has a history of shoulder problems, although he was fine last year. I guess I think that if he’s healthy, the Astros are going to regret this deal for years. I guess they have decided that he is most likely NOT going to be healthy and isn’t worth keeping.
Let’s see what we got:
1 – Miguel Asencio, age 26. Was signed by the Phillies as a 17 year old in 98 and was picked in the Rule V draft by the Royals in 02 – was mostly a starter – went 4-7 in 21 GS and 10 in relief over 123.1 IP (which comprises most of the ML innings he has pitched) with a 5.11 ERA; 1.62 WHIP; 1.24 HR/9; 4.67 BB/9; 4.23 K/9. Yep. Lousy. And he was just as lousy in the 48 innings he pitched the next year for the Royals. In 05, he pitched 19 innings in the Padres minor league system. He was then signed as a FA by the Rockies last year, and in AAA, he started 16 games, relieved in 22 more and, well, let’s say he wasn’t any good – 5.03 EA, 1.51 WHIP; 1.05 HR/9; 3.32 BB/9; 5.76 K/9 . He pitched 7.1 innings in Denver and again, he just sucked. I see absolutely ZERO evidence that this guy is any good at ALL – I suppose he is the much vaunted “long reliever” that Purpura, Phil and Drayton thought was gonna be so much better for the team than Russ Springer.
yeah, surrrrrrrrrrrrre. I’ll believe it when I see it.
2 – Jason Jennings, age 28, the 1 year rental. Our new #2 guy. This year only.
Here are his ML stats totals: 58-56 in 156 G with 6 CG and 3 SO – 4.74 ERA, 1.55 WHIP; 0.99 HR/9; 4.06 BB/9; 5.95 K/9.
Here are his ERA+ over the past 5 seasons: 108, 93, 92, 94, 127.
Career RSAA 25 (and 23 of those were from last year.)
He had a good year for the first time ever last year. What has he done for them lately – guess that’s what’s goin on there – 3.78 ERA, 1.37 WHIP; 0.72 HR/9; 3.61 BB/9; 6.03 K/9 IP… (are we being fooled by the low ERA as we were by Tim Redding???!!!)
Well, the Organization sure nuff couldn’t be impressed by his performance vs Houston -
1 – 4 in 6 GS with 1 CG SO over 36.1 IP – 8.42 ERA, 1.51 WHIP and a .297 BAA
He’s even worse at the Box – trust me on this.
Let’s suppose he really DID replace Andy Pettitte’s line from last year – 14 – 13 in 35 GS over 214.1 IP – 4.20 ERA, 1.44 WHIP; .284 BAA; 108 ERA+
He IS 7 mill cheaper, yeah.
But is 1 year of even Andy Pettitte quality (from last year) really worth giving up 2 ML pitchers who we controlled for 5-6 years each?
Even IF he pitched like Santana, which he’s not gonna do, would he be the ONE “piece of the puzzle” that would put us in the winners circle in the WS? Nope.
I would say this trade is worth it only if Jennings pitches 200 innings of .500 ball AND both Buchholz and Hirsh never ever are worth anything. Ever.
Asencio looks as if he is even worse than Zeke Astacio, if that’s even possible, so “depth in the bullpen” as Purpura is quoted as saying, sounds like piss poor judgement to me.
As I said, unless BOTH Buchholz and Hirsh are complete failures and don’t contribute a thing in the ML after this year, this trade looks like a win for the Rockies.
Why? Because we have to come up with TWO new pitchers next year, instead of none, that’s why. And we are short starters right now, as it is…
I’ve gotten comments and emails about Jennings saying basically, well, if he is as good as last year and IF he signs an extension like 3 fer 30 mill then this will be good.
He has had ONE good year. That is it. ONE good year. Period. He had a lower ERA last year mostly because of lowering his hits/9 IP from almost 10 to 8.5. Why should we think that he has somehow learned a different pitch, or has improved permanently, instead of thinking that last year was a fluke? Pitchers really DO have fluke years, just as hitters do (see Kevin Millwood…)
And WHY would Jason Jennings sign an elcheapo contract like 3 years for 30 mill right now instead of testing the FA market, as he told the Rockies he was going to do? For goodness sakes, Gil Freaking Meche, who isn’t near as durable or as good, got FIVE freaking years for 55 mill. Jennings would be out of his freaking mind to sign a contract like that, and I would bet his agent isn’t a dummy, neither.
AND please remember we ALREADY are committed to spending 39.5 mill on 3 guys BEFORE we spend another penny on anything else AND we have only 2 good young players left in the high minors and that is ALL we have in the farm, which, to be honest, is flat out lousy…