Mitchel Lichtman: In Defense Of Adam Everett

Some Astros “fans” have been quoting an article by Larry Dubrow (who usually writes for “men’s magazine” Maxim) on cbs.sportsline.com, in which he lists Adam Everett as one of the 10 worst players (not hitters, mind – players) in MLB.

Many fans do not believe that defense matters a plugged nickelunless they player makes an error. They don’t mind if a defender misses a ball for a hit – or throws badly and lets a run score. That doesn’t count. Problem is that most fans play fantasy baseball and there, defense counts for exactly zero. It matters none if a center fielder can’t throw and runners easily turn singles into doubles, score easily from first on a single, advance from second to third on an easy flyout.
These days when too many Gold Gloves are won with batting average (yeah Jeter, I’m lookin at you) too many people think that you ain’t all that if you don’t win a GG.

But too many people are wrong about Adam, currently mired in the team wide hitting slump that has only not affected Carlos Lee. And here to defend Adam is well know defense wizard Mitchel Lichtman, inventor of the well known UZR (Ultimate Zone Rating)

“It is hilarious how much Everett does not belong on the list. You have to have some knowledge of the advanced defensive metrics and a knowledge and understanding of how many runs a good, great, poor, horrible, etc. defender actually saves a team, as well as a knowledge and understanding of how any reasonable hitting metric translates into runs, not to mention the relative value of the positions on the defensive spectrum, in order to make a list like this.

While I give this author cedit for not just presenting players who are having a bad season (IOW recognizing the fluctuations that go along with 150 AB’s or so), he obviously has no idea as to how an offensive metric translates to runs and how many runs a particular player may be worth on defense. Nor should ANY catcher or SS (especially catcher) probably be on a list like this, as it is REALLY hard for a player at those positions to hit and field bad enough relative to the average player at that position to be “one of the worst players in baseball.”
Again, not only is Everett not one of the worst players in baseball, he is actually an above average player (SS), not withstanding his hitting performance thus far in 2007 (I assume that the author is talking about true talent and not what they have performed thus far this year). Everett is a once in a generation defensive player, maybe the best ever at any position. Even if that is an exaggeration, ALL of the advanced metrics (and not-so-advanced ones) have Everett at somewhere north of +20 runs a year in defense. I have him projected going into 2007 as +23. There is no possible way that a player can be a poor enought hitter to make a plus 23 defense turn into one of the worst players in baseball. Even if he were -25 in offense, which is about as bad as you can get (true talent-wise), and which he probably is, that makes him around -2 overall. The AVERAGE SS is -9 overall! That would make him an above average SS!

In order for Everett to be even replacement level, and there are lots of those in MLB, even as evereyday players, he would have to be over -50 in offense! There is no such animal in MLB. Not even close. Even if you are a skeptic of the +20 or so on defense (although I have never heard anyone credible NOT admit that Everett is one of the best if not the best defensive players in baseball), there is still NO POSSIBLE WAY that he can be close to one of the worst everyday players in baseball. Let’s give him +15 on defense. In order to be a replacement level SS overall, he would have to be -43 on offense. Again, no such animal in baseball. The last 4 years, Everett has been -19, -11, -30, and -25 on offense. Those are some of the worst offensive numbers in baseball. There is no doubt that he is one of the worst hitters in baseball. That still makes him AT LEAST and above average SS, again, given that he is plus some high number (15, 20, 25) on defense. There is simply no way to spin this to make Everrett anything less than an average player at worst and NO POSSIBLE WAY ON THE PLANET to make him a replacement level player (one of the worst everyday players in baseball), unless you make him an average SS on defense.

If someone wants to hail him as an average SS, that person has zero credibility anyway.”

WELL SAID!!!!

Tags: ,

6 Responses to “Mitchel Lichtman: In Defense Of Adam Everett”

  1. Austin says:

    Wow, I just read that article by Dubrow. I wonder if he has EVER watched a game of baseball before he sat down for his drug-induced haze of a weekend. In relation to Everett – he doesn’t think there’s room to have an anemic bat at one of the three most important defensive positions in the field? Does he have any stats to back up his assertion that Everett has lost more games with his bat than he’s won with his glove? Especially for such a pitching-oriented team, that’s just a stupid statement. It’s exactly that kind of thinking that has led Garner to sacrifice defense for hitting because he thinks his problem is personnel, through which he has DISMANTLED the winning equation that led the Astros to the World Series and turned them into one of the game’s worst teams.
    And he thinks Biggio needs to quit? This close to 3,000? Makes me wonder if he even knows that Biggio is pursuing such a prestigious mark.
    I’ll grant he has a little more ground to talk about Ausmus (though to talk about his offensive stats being so good shows complete ignorance of the fact that he ALWAYS starts hot and then cools). BUT, again, to act like throwing out baserunning is the only thing a catcher does shows profound ignorance of the game. Don’t get me wrong – I wish he had the arm he used to. But, you can’t negate how good he is working with pitchers and calling a game. This guy has no business writing about baseball.

  2. Austin says:

    Great article, Lisa. Very interesting. Thanks.

  3. Ben (xk3) says:

    I hereby nominate Larry Dubrow for biggest douche in the universe award for showing such incredible ignorance on such an easily researched subject.
    Congrats Larry… saying the top defensive SS in the game doesn’t belong on the MLB level means you’ve reached the top… the pinnacle of douche-dom!
    Also, Lisa, much props for continuing to help set the fans straight about he and Wandy’s performances and value; that gets a big ole ‘tip of the hat’! I guess some folks forget there’s more to baseball than the long ball…

  4. Irene says:

    Adam may be in a slump with his batting but he is still one hell of a ss and Houston needs him.

  5. [...] if you don’t want to take my word for it, that’s fine. Lisa Gray found an excerpt from Michael Lichtman responding to Adam Everett doubters. He essentially says the same thing I have found here, and he [...]

Leave a Reply